Discussion about this post

User's avatar
VP's avatar

This was a very interesting read, great job. Reminds me of UGA’s 2023 class (the first cycle where the staff had a national championship under their belts).

The in-state performance was abysmal, in part due to other schools stealing their lunch money, but also because the class was a down year instate.

It’s always interesting to consider where exactly a lot of these prospects are on the boards of these staffs. A lot of times in Georgia, there are kids who are highly rated and have a UGA offer, but who the staff are not prioritizing.

I agree with your conclusion that ideally I’m sure Bama’s staff would have liked to secure more prospects in-state (a few of them were committed before flipping to Auburn or elsewhere), but they also might not have been as impressed with the instate players this cycle. Will be interesting to see if it’s a trend, or just a momentary blip.

Expand full comment
2 more comments...

No posts